Testing that finds the bug before your customers do.Automated, manual, under load.
Test automation, manual testing and load testing for websites and software that need to actually hold up, not just work on the first try.
Software that doesn't get tested works fine, right up until it doesn't, usually exactly when it costs the most: with an important customer, under heavy load, or after an update that was only supposed to change something small. Testing isn't an optional last step; it's part of development itself.
We combine three layers: test automation with frameworks like Cypress and Selenium for recurring flows that run automatically on every change, manual, exploratory testing for cases that don't automate well, and load testing that shows how an application behaves under many simultaneous users before production does. None of this is theoretical: automating business and frontend tests for social-insurance applications was daily work for several years.
- Test automation with Cypress & Selenium
- Manual, exploratory testing
- Load testing for applications and websites
- Test frameworks that stay with the team, not just in one head
- ISTQB-certified testing approach
What people usually ask
Is test automation worth it for smaller projects too?
Once an application gets developed further on a regular basis, yes. A test written once keeps checking every following change, without anyone clicking through by hand.
Do you test software you didn't build yourselves?
Yes. Test automation, manual testing and load testing can all be set up for existing applications, regardless of who originally built them.
What's the difference between load testing and regular testing?
Regular testing checks whether a feature works correctly. Load testing checks whether it still does once many users are on it at the same time, surfacing performance issues that stay invisible in everyday use.
Let's talk about your project.
30 minutes, free. Afterwards you know what is holding the site back.